Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (9) Posted 11.06.03 | PERMALINK | PRINT

William Drenttel

Edward Tufte: The Dispassionate Statistician II


In a recent interview (here and here) with Edward Tufte by Dan Nadel (I.D. Magazine, November 2003), I was surprised to read Tufte saying that he discovered how "horrifying" PowerPoint was while doing a Google search for people who were teaching his work. In other words, he recognized PowerPoint as evil when he saw his own work projected through its lens — and worse still, that it was "contrary to my work on analytical design."

Tufte has a long and distinguished career, but his reputation was really cemented by his analysis of the Challenger crash in 1986 (well documented in Visual Explanations,1997). After the recent Columbia tragedy, with O-rings replaced by destructive foam, Tufte again wants to blame bad information design. For accuracy's sake, let me quote:

"And then the Columbia went down. I looked at the slides Boeing did during the flight, which indicated no danger from foam hitting the wing. NASA believed it, and we've seen what happened. Those were in PowerPoint. It's not that PowerPoint brought the Columbia down, but the method of presentation broke up the argument into tiny fragments..."

I am quoting here precisely because I want to suggest that PowerPoint was probably not a major contributor to the Columbia tragedy: it is pretty clear from the investigation and its final report that many people within NASA and Boeing thought the leaking foam was a (more) dangerous problem, and that the culture of NASA led to these voices being ignored.

Later in the same interview, Tufte observes: "I wanted to get it out fast and have an effect..." In other words, oppportunity harkened. The sales of his little booklet are strong, leading him to make the amazing claim that his website has "really come alive. It's the only success story in e-commerce!" In other words, the opportunity was realized.

Here's my question: Why is Tufte getting away with this well-executed publicity campaign, a stance that positions him as the discoverer of PowerPoint's evils? Almost everything said on this subject by Tufte was penned two years earlier, by Ian Parker, in an essay in The New Yorker entitled "Absolute Powerpoint: Can A Software Package Edit Our Thoughts" (May 28, 2001). [To be clear, there is NO suggestion of plagiarism in this criticism.] This was a major story in The New Yorker and an execellent piece of cultural criticism; it was widely discussed and received broad coverage in the media.

Read the piece for yourself: it has more original thinking, and is, arguably, better written than Tufte's essay. It's all over the web, but this copy was posted by the physics department at Ohio State — clearly, there are places in America that started talking about PowerPoint before Edward Tufte surfaced on this topic.

Finally, a question for design editors everywhere: When are we going to start publishing critical interviews in our design press? Certainly, there could have been much more probing questions for Edward Tufte. Journalists didn't let Al Gore get away with claiming credit for having started the internet, and in a similar fashion, Tufte shouldn't be allowed to get away with ridiculous statements like "It's the only success story in e-commerce!", or, for that matter, asserting a kind of ownership of PowerPoint — especially when someone else had already (and recently) written the story.

I suspect that Tufte's essay will have an inpact, and I hope it influences many to resist the spell of PowerPoint. Let's just not let him take all the credit.
|
Share This Story

Comments (9)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT COMMENT >>

Though I agree with your characterization of Tufte as a shameless self-promoter (and his attempt to cash in on the Columbia disaster seems pretty offensive), you should know that he has been criticizing PowerPoint-style presentations for some time now -- see, for example, page 68 of Visual Explanations (published in 1997), In general, he takes issue with the low-density and evanescent nature of the standard projected presentation, whether it's on a computer screen, on slides, or hand-written onto transparency film. I'm sure that he sees the PowerPoint pamphlet as an extension of his original critique.

Anyway, thanks a bunch for the site -- it has already become a daily habit.
Jose Nieto
11.06.03 at 07:29

Considering how most of corporate america used PowerPoint maybe it is not a bad thing that it presents information with a extremely high noise quotient. The less the corporate message gets out the better, although often times this message is fluffed up keywords and slogans. So much so that there is no message at all. Maybe that is why Powerpoint is so popular beyond the fact that there is little other choices besides bullets in microsoft word. Could powerpoint be the ultimate trojan horse of culture jamming? Go Bill!
bruno
11.07.03 at 12:41

I wonder if Tufte's comment about being the only success story in e-commerce is a bit of winking hyperbole, not entirely out of character for someone with an entrepreneurial bent.

The call for more critical design journalism is a much more important point. It's easy enough to find both glowing reviews and sharp critiques of particular projects or bodies of work, but it's much harder to find writing about design that calls for accountability in our work or statements. If it's a matter or good professional practice to be honest and accurate when dealing with our clients, it would be valid for design writing to assess whether or not treat each other and the public at large with the same respect.
Daniel Rhatigan
11.07.03 at 02:52

Maybe the interviewer didn't know about the Parker article. I sure didn't. I don't read The New Yorker and I don't know anyone who does (at least they haven't told me). Tufte™ has a much broader, diverse audience of parochial interest, so of course he can get away with appearing novel.

Anyhow, yeah, I agree. For a strong, healthy design discourse, journalists, writers, designers, teachers, students, etc., have to be better read in other areas of the marketplace, and not fawn over people to namedrop.
Aizan
11.07.03 at 08:10

I certainly agree with holding people like Edward Tufte, Jakob Nielsen and the like to critical scrutiny (not necessarily negative). But to quote Juvénal: Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Al Gore never claimed he invented the Internet. He claimed he led legislative efforts to turn the Internet from a defense/educational research project to a mainstream commercial enterprise. The claim was distorted in a media frenzy that has never been corrected by the mass-media outlets that propagated it in the first place.

See this article for details: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/13640.html
and http://www.kings.edu/twsawyer/y2kelect/honest-al.html for more examples of journalistic sloppiness.
Fazal Majid
11.19.03 at 03:45

Thanks again for part II of ‘As The Tufte’s World Turns’.

May I make a suggestion? I love the premise of your web site, but please consider re-designing your layout (look and feel) – the all gray background with reverse text is hard on the eyes. (Granted I can click on the ‘User Mode’ selection of my Opera browser but that turns everything into a sterile layout. ) Click here for an alternative solution to your site. My two cents. Thanks.
Dino
11.28.03 at 02:48

I have to agree with Fazal Majid that Al Gore's comments about the internet were distorted by the media. I stand corrected.

I'm going to let my comment about Tufte stand nonetheless: that the design and Wired media has let Tufte get away with seeming to be the one who discovered the evils of PowerPoint.

For another comment on this post, see Beth Mazur post on IDBlog: http://www.idblog.org/archives/000383.html.
William Drenttel
12.14.03 at 11:30

For another serious critique of Edward Tufte, please see Donald Norman's note on Kottke.org.

Tufte has a reputation for only contributing and particpating on his own terms. To hear this critique made by someone of Donald Norman's standing is refreshing.
William Drenttel
12.21.03 at 05:13

To add to William D. note: Read Donald Norman's comments on Tufte and PowerPoint at http://www.sociablemedia.com/articles_norman.htm.
Dino
01.09.04 at 08:58


|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

William Drenttel is a designer and publisher, and editorial director of Design Observer. He is a partner at Winterhouse, a design consultancy focused on social change, online media and educational institutions, and a senior faculty fellow at the Yale School of Management.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









BOOKS BY William Drenttel

Looking Closer 5
Allworth Press, 2006

Looking Closer 4
Allworth Press, 2002

Looking Closer 2
Allworth Press, 1997

Looking Closer 1
Allworth Press, 1994

More books by contributors >>

RELATED POSTS


Mr. Vignelli's Map
Vignelli Celebration: Massimo Vignelli's 1972 New York City subway map is a beautiful example of information design that was ultimately rejected by its users.

Reflections on The Ephemeral World, Part One: Ink
An elegy to the makeready — those sheets of paper, re-fed into a press to get the ink balances up to speed, leaving a series of often random, palimpsest-like, multiple impressions on a single surface — in the digital age.

Cranbrook Commencement Address
"I come to you, like all commencement speakers, as an emissary from the future." The commencement address delivered by Julie Lasky at the Cranbrook Academy of Art on May 9, 2008.

Greening the Grocery Store
It turns out that the "recycling symbol" at the bottom of my yogurt container had nothing to do with its recyclability. So why was it there? My curiosity led to findings around which I built a design class.

O.H.W. Hadank
Paul Rand held Hadank in the highest esteem because he practiced modernist formal principles even though he did not follow its dogma or style. And most important, as Rand said “Hadank was then and always an original. A profile of O.H.W. Hadank by Steven Heller...