Design Observer

Archive
Books + Store
Job Board
Email Archive
Comments
About
Contact
Log In
Register



Observatory

Resources
Submissions
About
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments Posted 08.18.09 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Alexandra Lange

Rearranging the Deck Chairs


My erstwhile colleagues at New York Magazine have covered the first episode of the third season of Mad Men in so many ways, there’s not much for a fan to add. I must praise the tight and revealing parallelism of the promotions of Pete Campbell (Vincent Kartheiser) and Ken Cosgrove (Aaron Staton). Their entrances, their body language, their questions for new British overlord Lane Pryce (Jared Harris), their exits were priceless displays of the difference between a pessimist and an optimist, an egotist and an extrovert. The jaunty way Ken took notes in the subsequent meeting, after their joint occupation of the position of Head of Accounts, made me chuckle with anticipatory glee.

But during the office scene with Pryce, something bothered me. Where in the Sterling Cooper office was his office? Why was it smaller than Don Draper’s? These questions are not insignificant, because they get at the ambiguity of Pryce’s position — which I suspect will be a dominant theme for the next few episodes. (I didn’t actually know he was the financial officer until I read the episode notes.) Pryce’s office says he is a rung down from Don in the hierarchy by its size, its lack of view, and yet he was making Don fire people, pulling company strings in the lavish and fanciful office of nominally in charge Bert Cooper. That Pryce is well aware of office appearances is apparent when he reprimands his own secretary (ambiguously male) for taking over the office of the old Head of Accounts. Mr. Hooker is sent back outside, to sit in public with the hens.

Series creator Matthew Weiner has been careful all along about office appearances. My dissertation was about corporate modernism in the 1950s and early 1960s, and this was when the size, furnishing and positioning of offices became an exact science. Don Draper’s office is, I would guess, twice the size of Pete Campbell’s, though I haven’t counted off the ceiling grid (probably a 5’ by 5’ module, which became standard) to know for sure. Don has a corner. You have to walk a long way to his door. Don has both a desk and two chairs and a sitting area, while Pete has a desk facing a sofa and a single window. Even Don’s modern art (undoubtedly picked by a corporate committee consisting of one Bert Cooper) is bigger.

Each element has meaning to the participants in the organizational chart, which is why having a door to close (even a door with someone else’s name on it) was so important to Peggy, and now Mr. Hooker. You can read a lot about character even in the same size offices of Pete and Peggy. He has his set up for socializing, desk facing the door and the sofa. Hers is all business, desk facing the wall and taking up the center of the room. Come to see her and you won’t get asked to sit down and have a drink.

We’ll see what happens in Pryce’s office, and to Pryce’s office as the season progresses. A change in furniture could spell disaster for our favorite sentient characters.

|
Share This Story

Comments

Design Observer encourages comments to be short and to the point; as a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
Read Complete Comments Policy >>


Name             

Email address 




Please type the text shown in the graphic.


|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Alexandra Lange is an architecture and design critic, and author of Writing about Architecture: Mastering the Language of Buildings and Cities. (Princeton Architectural Press, 2012). Her work has appeared in The Architect's Newspaper, Architectural Record, Dwell, Metropolis, Print, New York Magazine and The New York Times.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









BOOKS BY Alexandra Lange

Writing About Architecture: Mastering the Language of Buildings and Cities
Princeton Architectural Press, 2012

Design Research
Chronicle Books, 2010

More books by contributors >>

RELATED POSTS


The World's Smashing-est Kids' TV Show
A review of Karambolage, a kids’ television show produced by ARTE, a French-German arts and culture channel.

Focusing On 'Optics'
Optics: The indispensible buzzword for those who analyze pseudo-events.

The Critical Olympics
What the best sports commentary does is just like criticism: it makes you care about the previously abstract.

I Love the 80s
Miami Vice: the quintessential postmodern design artifact, in all its glory and all its disgrace.

Downton Abbey: Fell In Love With a House
Downton Abbey, for all its melodrama and dropped teacups, is really the story of falling in love with a house.