Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (4) Posted 12.16.10 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Alexandra Lange

On Boring



The original Pennsylvania Station in 1962, two years from demolition (via Wikipedia).

I get told all the time that I am boring. "I really liked what you wrote about Modern Family, but the rest of your stuff, you know..." Shrug. That's friends. Or from an editor: "I couldn't gin up enough interest around the office." Another editor: "What's the news hook?" Yet a third editor: "Hits a little too close to home for us."

I used to be depressed by this, and to fear that I was boring. But then I started taking my boring ideas elsewhere, and found that the evolution of the modern kitchen, our national obsession with food and (I hope) the concept that kids make better cities are not always boring. It's circumstantial. It's in the execution. But have architecture and design been permanently slotted into the boring category? Can only alliances with organic farming and hotshot authors ever get them out?

In my rovings I also noticed something else. Almost every publication I regularly read publishes boring stories. They have just decided which boring they like. Examples? New York ran a four-page story on re-translating Madame Bovary. The New York Times Magazine profiled another counter-tenor. (That's just culture. I rarely read the foreign policy stories, meaning I often don't read the NYTM at all.) The New Yorker, in recent memory, Burkhard Bilger on fermentation. Desinger Frank Chimero just praised the Times online series "The Elements of Math" as the best thing he'd read all year, and asked for more such lessons. Math! Now, I am not saying that I did not find the translation and fermentation stories fascinating, but I hope we can agree that they are, like math, in a larger sense, boring.

Also boring: those weeks, like the these just past, in which everyone is talking about one story (Gawker redesign, Wikileaks, Gawker hack) and, since everyone wants to be part of the conversation, they need to weigh in on the one story too. I think Nicola Twilley's GOOD post title, "Finally, A Wikileaks Food Story," was a joke, but you never know.

Besides GOOD, these are mostly publications that seem to only publish on architecture and design in the rarest of circumstances: a review of a new and unmissable building; a profile of an architect so famous I already know all the details; a designer whose process is made to sound miraculous, when really it is just what industrial designers do. (I complained about the last in the New Yorker profile of James Dyson. Now Alice Rawsthorn, of all people, repeats the same canard in a piece on Konstantin Grcic and black rectangles: "Many designers begin a new project by imagining the end result, but Mr. Grcic starts by anticipating how it will be used and shapes it accordingly." Straw Man 101: Do we really think most product designers have a line of pretty sculptures on their desks and, when asked to design a soap, a phone or a vacuum, simply point at their favorite?)

The way architecture becomes un-boring for such publications is when people who are not architecture writers take an interest. Case in point: Tom Scocca and Choire Sicha's recent Op-Ed on the wonders of Penn Station. Today's Penn station. I agree it would have been boring to run an editorial on how the old Penn Station was so great (see "What's the news hook?). I also agree there's no sense crying over decades-old spilt milk. But would this Op-Ed have run if it had been written by a duo without meta-media credibility? Were they even serious? My husband, who does not understand the relentless quest for the contrary, was offended by it. I shrugged it off, while regretting that every architecture Tweep RT the piece. Penn Station! In the Times! It was too exciting as an event to resist, even if what Scocca and Sicha seemed to be saying was this was the best we (as architects, designers, a culture) can do. Call me a utopian. I'd like some daylight.

If I have learned anything from this year, it is to write the critiques I can't stop thinking about, and to stop trying to find topics editors don't think are boring. Like beauty, it is in the eye of the editor.
|
Share This Story

Comments (4)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT COMMENT >>

Boring

12.16.10 at 09:56

Synchronous. I had some thoughts on this issue about half an hour ago, and am drafting a blog post in my mind as I program. Some of my thinking:

The boring label that gets slapped on designers' effort to promote ideas has more to do with what makes designers designers, than with anything else. Designer qualities separate designers from other people, on a real-time basis. Only cumulatively, after a designer's serial actions have produced tangible results, is a connection established between a designer and most other people, from the most-other-people pov. Case in point - I could draw what I just said, better than I've said it - what I just said is too abstract and recursive to be easily translated into everyday language.

Designer qualities that separate designer from others include: heightened clarity of vision; ability to transform a reality into an abstraction into a revised abstraction into a new reality; an innate feel for physics; a willingness to risk; a willingness to put hands, mind and heart to work to produce results no one else believes exist as yet; perseverance; stamina.

Many non-designers have some of these qualities. But in my experience, only designers typically have all of them.

Add to that the possibility that we become designers because we see and object to the frailty of good communication - so we invest ourselves in showing and doing, rather than telling.

But the rest of the world tells, and likes being told. Designers don't have a hearty participation in that telling dynamic. That makes designers outliers - and their special collections of qualities and skills do, too.

What does boring really mean? Modality conflict and lack of understanding, usually. If others like to tell and be told, but designers "don't do that" and designers know stuff that others don't know or understand, most of what designers try to communicate - except their work - will be tagged as boring.
Heather Quinn
12.16.10 at 10:43

Saint-Exupéry wrote a couple of books concerning flying, but he took pains to remind us that the only thing that made it dramatic was his relationship to other people - his point being that his battling of the weather, if nothing else is at stake, is fundamentally boring.

So much of "architecture" is framed in just these boring terms: frank battling titanium cladding, without viagra! Its no wonder we're a sad, boring lot.

Shining a light on the cast of thousands actually involved in making that wrinkled titanium shaft might be exciting (quick: how many of frank's clones were pulling 80hr weeks when their work visas expired? how many tens of thousands of hours of work did frank get for free from these "employees"? who in the studio really designed the form?) is just one example of many narratives that could bring interest...
Mr. Downer
12.16.10 at 09:30

As I get older I can find almost anything interesting. Even if only a small aspect, say the filter of perception about which the author and I disagree. This is perhaps a sign that I, myself, am becoming boring.
Doug C.
12.21.10 at 10:09


Design Observer encourages comments to be short and to the point; as a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
Read Complete Comments Policy >>


Name             

Email address 




Please type the text shown in the graphic.


|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Alexandra Lange is an architecture and design critic, and author of Writing about Architecture: Mastering the Language of Buildings and Cities. (Princeton Architectural Press, 2012). Her work has appeared in The Architect's Newspaper, Architectural Record, Dwell, Metropolis, Print, New York Magazine and The New York Times.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









BOOKS BY Alexandra Lange

Writing About Architecture: Mastering the Language of Buildings and Cities
Princeton Architectural Press, 2012

Design Research
Chronicle Books, 2010

More books by contributors >>

RELATED POSTS


The Ten Most Popular Essays of 2013
Our most popular essays of 2013 range in topic from design criticim to punctuation, surrealism to fast food restaurant design, Rem Koolhaas to South African towns, and of course, the heated debate on the future of the AIGA.

Accidental Mysteries, 11.27.11
Welcome to Accidental Mysteries, a weekly cabinet of visual curiosities set aside for your perusal and enlightenment.

Design and Health: Flipping the Pyramid
It's easy for two people to look at the same information — such as this chart (above) about health costs — and perceive totally different things.

Accidental Mysteries, 11.06.11
Welcome to Accidental Mysteries, a weekly cabinet of visual curiosities set aside for your perusal and enlightenment.

Accidental Mysteries, 10.09.11
Welcome to Accidental Mysteries, a weekly cabinet of visual curiosities set aside for your perusal and enlightenment.