Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (9) Posted 06.09.11 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Mark Lamster

Philip Johnson's Synagogue Problem




In the mid-1950s, Philip Johnson designed a synagogue for Kneses Tifereth Israel, a congregation in suburban Port Chester, New York. Johnson, in the 1930s and early 1940s, had been a proponent of Nazi Germany and a writer of anti-semitic tracts, so the job was presented as a kind of atonement, and completed without fee. It was also his largest institutional commission to date (at the time, he was primarily an architect of refined modernist homes), so a handy resume builder.

Johnson provided a little commentary on his design thinking for this project in a catalog for the 1963 exhibition Recent American Synagogue Architecture, curated by a young Richard Meier at New York's Jewish Museum:  
The problem in designing the contemporary synagogue is a nearly impossible one....The difficulty comes from the habits of the High Holy Days when the attendance, shall we say, swells. Now the space is either great small or great large, but it can hardly act like an accordion and be great small and large. How to design a room that will be great both ways? Our solution at Port Chester was a great room, with a small screen divider, because it seemed to us that most of the congregation comes on the on High Holy Days and we wanted the community to enjoy the temple.
The "High Holiday" problem, it should be noted, is not any different for a Jewish house of worship than it is for a Christian one. In any case, there are tools at the architect's disposal to mitigate this problem: a fan layout, for instance, in which the wings can be closed off, is a good deal more amenable to shifting audience sizes. Balconies offer additional space that can be filled on busy holidays but otherwise don't make a place feel empty. Which is all to say, Johnson's suggestion that a space can either be "great small" or "great large" is false. KTI, anyway, isn't great, period. 

Johnson's design, a rectangular box for the sanctuary with an attached eliptical entry pavilion, was essentially cribbed from an earlier project, for a church. (The relationship between pavilion and sanctuary is considerably more fluid in the original scheme.) The sanctuary is a simple, bright room, its signature element being its wavy ceiling, which is suspended from above and appears to float, like a giant rectangular ribbon pinned to the walls. There's nothing particularly ethereal about it, though it is impressive, and is arguably an early manifestation of postmodern design. Johnson liked cathedrals. I suspect he had that kind of scale in mind when he designed this big shoebox.  

The congregation has wrestled with the building for decades, and a few years ago undertook an unfortunate renovation. The dramatic Ibram Lassaw sculpture that had been placed behind the altar has been replaced with a panel of Jerusalem stone. One can at least muster some justification for the removal of the wire sculpture, which some claimed reminded them of concentration camp fencing. There really is no defense for the egregious screen that divides the sanctuary in half, leaving the back free as an open space for synagogue functions. 

One sympathizes with the congregation; dealing with this ungainly space is not easy. Johnson himself couldn't figure out how to do it, and wound up designing for the exception rather than the rule. But there's got to be a more elegant solution, and it need not break the bank. The building, whatever its weaknesses, is not without qualities. It may never be great, but it doesn't have to be bad.

Some images follow.

















|
Share This Story

Comments (9)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT COMMENT >>

The punchline for an old Jewish gent ....." so what did you expect for free from a former Nazi ? " Great article !!
Richard
06.09.11 at 05:22

Is the explanation of Johnson's design intent really so simple? Adapting an unused design for a different client, no matter the dogma or liturgy, isn't really that shocking, let alone in 20th century.
Any record of the design process with client? What you call a "wave" I see as his major interest in vault forms during the period. And actually, it resembles more a tent. Talith symbology, anyone? The project dismissal seems a bit too quick.
Jon Buono
06.09.11 at 06:51

i don't think i've dismissed the project. i think it's an interesting, if not entirely successful building, which is why i put this piece up. it's disappointing that the congregation hasn't done better by it. otherwise, yes, johnson was interested in vaults at the time, as the metropolis piece i've linked to makes very clear.

it's an important commission for johnson, so you can be sure i will be dealing with it in greater depth down the line.
mark lamster
06.09.11 at 08:46

Mark

I'm curious about your first paragraph. Was the job "presented as a kind of atonement" at the time? Was the congregation aware of the extent of Johnson's fascist activities (the ride into Poland following the Wehrmacht and his acompanying anti-semitic articles)?

I had always understood that Johnson's friends had suppressed his history of fascism and racism effectively enough that it was only known by those closest to him.

Was his backstory something everybody knew, but nobody mentioned in polite company (until Sorkin in Spy Magazine)?

javier zeller
06.10.11 at 05:02

the trustees were aware, or some of them were--everyone was too polite to confront it too much. "presented" may have been a poor word choice by me: it was not publicly offered as an expiation.the majority of the congregation was almost certainly unaware.

otherwise, johnson's history was no great secret in ny society at that time. some forgave him for it. others didn't.
mark lamster
06.10.11 at 06:30

Mark
Glad you posted this. I've always wanted to see his famous "atonement." And you analysis is always informative.

You say "johnson's history was no great secret in ny society at that time. some forgave him for it. others didn't." This is true with a caveat.

Fact is, many in NY society were anti-Semites (NY was loaded with "exclusive" clubs, like the Metropolitan Club. Across the street is the Harmonie Club, created by Jews who were restricted from joining NY society). This group of anti-Semites may not have supported Hitler, but many did, both philosophically and (as in the case of Henry Ford) monetarily.

I hear from Johnson's friends that he did indeed do generous things for others, including his Jewish friends. Maybe you can elaborate on how, what, where and when he renounced his youthful fascination with the Nazis and Father Coughlin.
Steven heller
06.11.11 at 11:55

steve:

johnson was a man of contradictions. he was a friend to jews at the same time that he was condemning them. he began his process of expiation during the war--with his words, his actions, and his checkbook.

this is a subject that demands a lot more than a reply in a blog post comment thread. i will be addressing it in depth, in the future.

-mark

mark lamster
06.11.11 at 08:35

a work in keeping with his normal quality.
not a maestro, but working the crowd and performing well.
jonathan
06.12.11 at 09:18

It turns out that Johnson probably did not have atonement in mind as much as "getting the job." In my new book, Building After Auschwitz: Jewish Architecture and the Memory of the Holocaust (Yale, 2011), I discuss the story of KTI in a bit of detail. It happens to be the case that Johnson first offered his design to another local synagogue, Temple Sholom in Greenwich, but not for free (he did so through his contacts with Albert and Vera List, who were congregants). This is why the board of trustees ended up going with the cheaper design of the architect, Ralph Pomerance, who was a congregant (and the brother in law of historian, Barbara Tuchman). Only after Johnson was rejected by Temple Sholom did he offer his design to KTI, this time for free. Had altruism and atonement been motivating forces, he should have offered his design to Temple Sholom for free in the first place.

-Gavriel Rosenfeld

12.06.11 at 12:56


Design Observer encourages comments to be short and to the point; as a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
Read Complete Comments Policy >>


Name             

Email address 




Please type the text shown in the graphic.


|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Lamster is the architecture critic of the Dallas Morning News and a professor at the University of Texas at Arlington School of Architecture. A contributing editor to Architectural Review, he is currently at work on his third book, a biography of the late architect Philip Johnson. Follow: @marklamster.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









RELATED POSTS


The Ten Most Popular Essays of 2013
Our most popular essays of 2013 range in topic from design criticim to punctuation, surrealism to fast food restaurant design, Rem Koolhaas to South African towns, and of course, the heated debate on the future of the AIGA.

Accidental Mysteries, 11.27.11
Welcome to Accidental Mysteries, a weekly cabinet of visual curiosities set aside for your perusal and enlightenment.

Design and Health: Flipping the Pyramid
It's easy for two people to look at the same information — such as this chart (above) about health costs — and perceive totally different things.

Accidental Mysteries, 11.06.11
Welcome to Accidental Mysteries, a weekly cabinet of visual curiosities set aside for your perusal and enlightenment.

Accidental Mysteries, 10.09.11
Welcome to Accidental Mysteries, a weekly cabinet of visual curiosities set aside for your perusal and enlightenment.