Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (5) Posted 08.15.11 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Rob Walker

Wear And Tear




Cell Phone Wear and Tear


In the “green room” at a conference a year or so ago, another guy who was going to give a talk abruptly said to me: “Is that really your phone?”  He was some kind of Web 2.0 expert, and he had an accent that I couldn’t place, but that would have made me feel inferior, even if he hadn't asked me something blatantly intended to make me feel inferior.

Still, he was on to something. That was, and indeed is, really my cell phone. And, yes, it’s comically primitive by the standards of the smartphone era. There are various reasons that I've stuck with this device, but the main one is that it still works. And I at least trying to use things until they can no longer be used.

In a column in the September issue of The Atlantic, however, I confess the not-admirable flipside of the pious sentiment I have just expressed. Namely, I admit that sometimes I wish my gadgets would die, because that would give me an excuse to buy the next new thing (which quite often happens to be quantifiably better). I argue that in the realm of gadgets, at least, product obsolescence is partly a demand-side phenomenon. You can read that piece here.

iPod "Classic" Wear and Tear

A spinoff issue relevant to that column, and to my old-phone embarrassment, and to tech-product design broadly (digital as well as physical) is the status of wear and tear. Some objects can surely be enhanced by wear and tear: your favorite blue jeans, my old leather jacket, that particular nightstand, some kid’s hard-ridden skateboard, an obsessively re-read book, almost every building in the French Quarter, etc. Moreover, sometimes an absence of wear and tear is actually detrimental. Consider a carpenter showing up at your house with pristine, unmarked tools. Would you trust this person? Or imagine the self-described outdoorsman whose boots show no signs of wear, or the professed gardener with a glistening shovel and squeaky-clean work gloves: Poseurs, surely.

A passing comment in a FutureLab post earlier this year about “creating emotional attachments to digital objects” at least feints in the direction of trying to apply wear-and-tear appeal to the tech realm: 

One idea that a colleague mentioned to me involved the notion of "dynamic weathering" of applications -- the more that you use an app, the more that it would appear "weathered" and used. People would know how often you were reading by how "worn" your iPad's screen looked, for example.

Well, maybe. It's too bad the idea is not pursued any further; this stray thought sounds more like a potential art project than a consumer strategy.

But I like the notion just the same, since it obviously gets at a crucial crossroads: Something designed to be lived with vs. something designed to be replaced. This is not solely a matter for the profession; product-users (or consumers, if you like) have a major say, simply by virtue of the way we value what we use. It's amusing to imagine a demand for the gadget equivalent of "distressed" denim or "antiqued" furniture. For now though, I think visible traces of long and heavy use signal, "Time for a new one."

Laptop Wear and Tear

Mouse Wear and Tear

Lately I’ve become very tuned in to evidence of wear and tear on smartphones, laptops, tablets, and other devices: Scratches, dings, visual suggestions that a thing is a tool with a history of use — rather than a Fabergé Egg fussily dusted and polished, so that its status signal ever shines. On scrutiny, some of the wear and tear actually has a perversely pleasing look to it, to me at least.

Plus it's been instructive to ponder the wear and tear on something like a remote control: on mine, the graphic on the “fast forward” button has worn away completely. What this says about my attention span, the quality of the programming on my DVR, or both, I'll leave to your speculations. In any case, I don't think any of this stuff, stretching back to my (still functioning, but long unused) first-generation iPod, was really designed to accommodate wear and tear. I've simply been slow to replace it.



Remote Control Wear and Tear



First Generation iPod Wear and Tear

While I confess in that Atlantic column to what must be at least partly an aesthetic urge – in short, my craving for “shiny new” things – I also find something appealing in the way wear and tear undermines shiny-newness. I mean that wear and tear undermines shiny-newness aesthetically, but I also mean it undermines that concept almost ideologically, particularly in the context of tech objects. Wear and tear, considered this way, may not result in or reflect an "emotional attachment," but it can feel a bit like a tiny form of resistance: I refuse to buy the latest gadget; I reject your mindless privileging of the new; and yeah, jackass, as a matter of fact, this really is my phone.

(Well, you know ... for now at least.)

See Also:

On the subject of bluejean wear and tear, this 2005 Consumed column explained how a premium denim brand (PRPS) skillfully damaged its product to appear convincingly worn and torn in a manner consistent with the behavior of someone who actually conducts physical labor.

And this 2010 column makes (disapproving) note of Olympic snowboarding uniforms also calculated to appear worn and torn.

Finally, this column addresses tools for what I referred to as digital antiquing, which surely has some connection to wear and tear. There's an emphasis on Hipstamatic, but if I were writing it today I would of course cite Instagram instead.


|
Share This Story

Comments (5)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT COMMENT >>

Yeah, same deal w/ my phone.

Also interesting I think is the way breaking-in reflects the relationship of the usage of a thing. It undermines Shiny Newness and in doing so insists on the lived experience of its functionality. The wear and tear is a record of _how_ a design _works_, rather than simply its contours of its form and polish of the chrome.
Z. Sachs
08.15.11 at 01:48

I think one of the big issues with this topic is physical fragility.

What I mean is this: many tech gadgets are quite fragile. So it's the norm to see iphones and macbooks and cameras and even gps's in cases. There is an entire industry of cases for gadgets. And if you have a friend who uses his phone without a case, well, he might be considered a bit of a rogue.

We have learned, for good reason, that tech needs protection.

Alternatively, I dare you to find someone wearing a leather jacket with a protective plastic covering on it. Leather (and the denim of jeans and the wood of that kid's well-worn skateboard...) is tough. It's not going to break. There's no fear of it snapping or popping or crackling. It's because of that toughness that leather has the opportunity to get worn-in.

Wear and tear is very, very physical. It's the feeling of the sneakers you wore every day for the entire summer. It's the smoothness of the inside of the baseball mitt you played with in high school. So long as gadgets are fragile, it's going to be a hard reach for them to really 'wear in' well. But perhaps a Panasonic tough book has the patina you're looking for? And maybe we should be seeing the opportunity for gadget cases that wear elegantly?
Carly Hagins
08.16.11 at 12:11

Well said, Z. Sachs.
Carly Hagins: I just love the mere thought of a protective plastic cover for a leather jacket! Too funny. Love the other points, too, though I must speak up a little for gadget toughness: I've dropped phones, iPods, etc., too many times to count, and they always seem to hold up. They're not infinitely tough, but not as fragile as one might assume. Actually this reminds me a friend of mine has a cell phone with near-shattered screen, but keeps it because despite that it still works! I should get a picture of that next time I see him...
Rob Walker
08.17.11 at 09:25

Boston Globe's "Brainiac" weighs in on this column, here:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2011/08/21/brainiac/

"My guess: Someday, when gadgets are physically tougher, and when 'newness' is more about software than hardware, people will be carving their initials into their mobile phones and laptops."
Rob Walker
08.21.11 at 07:35

Having recently moved back to NYC, I was confronted with how many things I have. Already having a distaste for the mindset of constantly replacing perfectly good items with the latest shinier versions I've also taken to getting full use from my everyday objects.

With that mindset my long distance running has changed, also I don't want to embarass myself or disgrace the magnitude of running a full marathon. Namely that I've stopped talking, and just doing. Removing rubber molecule by molecule from the bottom of my shoes, repurposing and reshaping my body and having calluses that have long ago merged to encompass all of my toes, some no longer bearing first second or third generation nails, or any at all.

There is great satisfaction in knowing that being a human, one of the few creatures fully capable of bipedal locomotion I am utilizing this potentiality. And seeing the aesthetic result doesn't hurt either.

08.30.11 at 10:17


Design Observer encourages comments to be short and to the point; as a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
Read Complete Comments Policy >>


Name             

Email address 




Please type the text shown in the graphic.


|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Rob Walker is a technology/culture columnist for Yahoo News. He is the former Consumed columnist for The New York Times Magazine, and has contributed to many publications. He is co-editor (with Joshua Glenn) of the book Significant Objects: 100 Extraordinary Stories About Ordinary Things, and author of Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS