Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (2) Posted 07.20.12 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Mark Lamster

The Once & Future Library



Room 300, home of the art & architecture collection, of the NYPL. Photo: Norman McGrath

The future is now, the saying goes, and for those of us who live and work in the world of letters, that maxim rings especially true. Tablets and e-readers and the overwheming availability of digitized content are transforming the way we consume information, the kinds of information we consume, and—not least of all—the places in which we do that consumption. Just how libraries are adapting to this new world of information is the subject of my cover story for the July issue of Metropolis, a piece prompted by the contested plans to dramatically redesign, both intellectually and physically, the main research library of the NYPL. 

Although it's tempting to think that the "future is now," one of the realities about which I write is that the future is still in the future. We live in a time of competing technologies, and just how these will shake out in 2 or 5 or 10 years is anything but clear. While the Internet offers an enormous amount of content, it is disorganized, subject to randomness, and absent equally enormous amounts of material that has not been and may never be scanned. As one scholar told me, "Google has the problem that it's an index from nowhere, and it's not even a good index." Predicting the future is hard, and libraries have a pretty dubious record. The NYPL only recently bet big on CD-ROMs for its Science Industry and Business Library (SIBL). Now it wants to close that building, as part of its restructuring. 


High density stacks at Mansueto Library. Photo: Tom Rossiter

This should suggest a somewhat cautious path, and this in fact characterizes the most sophisticated new research library, the University of Chicago's recent Mansueto Library, designed by Helmut Jahn as an appendage to the school's primary research facility, a 1970s concrete bunker by SOM. The genius of Mansueto is that it holds books in high-density pallets retrieved by automated cranes, allowing it to serve books with extreme rapidity. But this library of the future was designed only to serve the library's needs for a few decades; it is, essentially, an interim solution until the future actually arrives. 

It's also worth noting that while many are anxious to proclaim the death of the library, we seem to be building more of them than ever, and they seem to be playing ever more central roles in our communities, even if their primary functions are not longer to serve books to readers.

In any case, I hope you will read the story
|
Share This Story

Comments (2)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT COMMENT >>

I think it is a little too early to state that these competing technologies will "shake" out. As history shows us, I believe we are in a new genre of technology release. More and more, barriers are breaking down to fund, build and release new technologies than ever before. Are we past the point of achieving a new "solid" format like the television that had a hold on us for decades? Or is touch-screens simply the new remote-format that will stick around for decades to come? Are these organizations waiting for a future that will only out-date itself in couple years rather than couple decades in previous project lifespan expectations? Perhaps these organizations should design
Robert
07.22.12 at 12:31

One thing seems clear. The library is going to be a battleground for corporate copyright and control, like the e-reader.
Carnegie established thousand of libraries as an end run around the cost of books as an impediment to knowledge. Rights management limits both the number and usefulness of electronic books through many of their useful lifespans increasing costs and decreasing volume for libraries.
As much as I love physical books I see the e-reader being the clear winner in the same way cd's were vanquished by the inferior mp3 and ultimately changing the library to an online resource.

07.23.12 at 10:41


Design Observer encourages comments to be short and to the point; as a general rule, they should not run longer than the original post. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
Read Complete Comments Policy >>


Name             

Email address 




Please type the text shown in the graphic.


|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mark Lamster is the architecture critic of the Dallas Morning News and a professor at the University of Texas at Arlington School of Architecture. A contributing editor to Architectural Review, he is currently at work on his third book, a biography of the late architect Philip Johnson. Follow: @marklamster.
More Bio >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS