Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (2) Posted 02.19.14 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Rob Walker

A Security Camera Worth Looking At


All images courtesy of Fabrique.

Does it matter what a security camera looks like? After all, the object's function is to see, not be seen, right?

Or is there, actually, more to it than that?

I’ve pondered this before, noting here a few months back my interest in how some security cameras seem shy, and others boldly announce themselves (generally as a kind of warning).

Either way, let’s face it, the rectangular-style closed-circuit television camera is in the category of a stealth icon: We all recognize it, and it says “surveillance.” Consider a recent New Yorker illustration for a story about National Security Agency surveillance (which has nothing to do with video cameras) — a tree of boxy CCTV devices topped by an American flag.

We all get it immediately. And it’s not exactly comforting. 

Not long ago, Anne Miltenburg brought to my attention the most thoughtful take I’ve yet encountered on the question of what a security camera ought to look like. It’s a project for Dutch Railways, implemented a few years ago by Amsterdam-based firm Fabrique — and it resulted in a form of security camera that expects to be seen.

I got in touch with that firm’s creative director, Jeroen van Erp, and we spoke via Skype a couple of weeks ago. “The goal was to reduce the Big Brother feeling,” van Erp told me, straightaway. Dutch Railways (or NS), had done some research on “what kind of emotions were or weren’t evoked” by its camera system.

“People knew there were cameras,” he continued, but they didn’t always know where they were (since the cameras were mounted to see, without much thought to being seen). And when they did spot one, they didn’t necessarily feel great about it. According to the data van Erp gave me, research found that while 68% of subjects agreed that the cameras they saw made them “feel safe,” an alarming 34% also said the objects inspired “a ‘big brother’ feeling.” (And a mere 9% found the things  “beautiful,” which is actually a surprisingly high number, to me.)

“So we said: Let’s try to change attitudes, with design,” van Erp said.

Here’s the Fabrique sketch board, and I think the notable influence here is the friendly Pixar character. 

Rounded edges, bright colors, a more organic sense of living “eye”-ness: The upshot was a camera that’s comfortable being visible.

The cameras were also deployed in a more determinedly visible way, acknowledging that people should see them.

“Why not be honest,” van Erp asks, “and show that you’re watching people — or watching spaces, to keep people safe and secure?”

 

As security cameras go, I do find Fabrique’s creation appealing: It’s warm, charismatic.

Certainly it doesn’t feel stern and oppressive or menacing, as traditional box-style CCTV cameras do.

The data van Erup gave me suggests that the public agrees with this sentiment, and responded positively to these cameras. The percentage who called the object “beautiful” leapt to 80%; those reporting Big Brother vibe dropped to 12%. And the obviously critical safe-feeling response rose a bit — to 71%.

Of course there’s an interesting question lurking in the background here. Even it if it’s possible to make security cameras look like our friends — are they?

Or is inviting design serving here as a kind of disguise?

I don’t question the motives of Dutch Railways or van Erp, of course. Frankly, I think any step toward making these cameras things we look at and consider is a plus.

But it’s interesting — it's disconcerting — to consider what it might mean to like a security camera.

If you have seen other examples of thoughtful security camera design, please let me know in the comments or @notrobwalker or the "contact" mechanism here. And thanks again to Anne Miltenburg!

Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


Architecture and the Aestheticization of Politics


Building Data: Field Notes on the Future of the Past


In the Air of Madrid


Staring Back at Security Cameras


Where We Work



RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (2)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Rob, apparently our mirror neuron system works when seeing security cameras and robots too. What will happen when these cameras and robots work together to mirror our empathy?
Thank you.


Carl W. Smith
02.22.14 at 07:44

Interesting, thanks as ever, Carl.

Also on a completely unrelated note, someone on Facebook pointed out that the cameras discussed above resemble a camera in the game Half-Life. (No idea which came first, and this is most likely a coincidence, but interesting.)

http://half-life.wikia.com/wiki/File:Portal_2_Security_Camera.png
Rob Walker
02.25.14 at 10:53



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



Rob Walker is a technology/culture columnist for Yahoo News. He is the former Consumed columnist for The New York Times Magazine, and has contributed to many publications. He is co-editor (with Joshua Glenn) of the book Significant Objects: 100 Extraordinary Stories About Ordinary Things, and author of Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS