Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (2) Posted 01.30.13 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Rob Walker

Branding By Numbers


But what does the data say? American Airlines’ “Flight Symbol,” via FutureBrand

Looking for yet another opinion about the American Airlines logo redesign? Well, here’s one anyway: “FutureBrand has done a good job of implementing a contemporary look that nicely augments and preserves American’s traditional identity, weighted down as it is with somewhat dated elements.”

That’s from Emblemetric, a blog that launched back in July and that “reports on trends in logo design, using quantitative analysis,” drawing on a “database of more than 1.2 million logos dating back to 1884.” Its analyses, in other words, are based not anecdote, conjecture, or assertion, but on the data.

In the course of assessing the new American Airlines logo, Embelmetric offers up various charts relating to the frequency of use of stars, eagles, wings, red-and-blue color schemes, and abstraction, in the logos of transportation firms and U.S. companies in general, between 1968 and 2011. Stars have apparently gotten more popular; eagles less so. Emblemetric also has a sort of bar chart that assigns a “trendiness” rating to elements of the AA logo such as “single diagonals” (trendy!) and  “U.S. flags” (un-trendy!).

“Trendiness” of design elements, 2007-2011, via Emblemetric

If you’re skeptical: I understand. I don’t want to see data-mining replace point of view. From a recent Awl piece about “Big Data” criticism: "A content analysis of Animal Farm can tell you what Animal Farm says about animals. But it can't tell you what it says about Stalinism." As that piece suggests, any data set, no matter how vast, is only as useful as what a knowledgeable interpreter makes of it.

And Emblemetric’s analysis is not purely database-driven: The American writeup cites various contemporary and historical sources and obviously exercises some critical judgment. (The specific use of words like “traditional” and “dated,” both of which are loaded variations on “old,” is one example.)

So I don’t consider Emlemetric the last word, but I do think it’s useful, and certainly interesting — especially on broad trends. How can you not enjoy a graph like the one below, quantifying logo shape-usage over decades? Or on the increased use of leaves in logos? Or one on the uptick of logos involving “two stars in a circle”?


Percentage of new logos featuring specific shape elements, via Emblemetric


Percentage of new logos containing leaves, via Emblemetric


“Logos with two stars in a circle, as a percentage of all logos,” via Emblemetric.

In other words, I’m more drawn in by Emblemetric’s offering of information about broad trends than its assessment of any specific logo. (Although I more or less agree with its verdict on American’s logo.)

My main suggestion for the blog, actually, would involve its actual graphics, which are, to be blunt, rather ugly. C’mon: You can do better than whatever free plug-in produced these charts and graphs! This is the age of mouthwatering data-visualization and fancy infographics!

Or at least I’m pretty sure that’s the trend; I haven’t run the numbers.  

Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot Dot


Accidental Mysteries, 03.25.12


Interface Time


Networks Before the Internet


Battle Hymn of the Tiger Cub



RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (2)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Had no idea this site existed thanks for writing about it.
jj
02.02.13 at 07:53

I'm sorry, but this is exactly the kind of info I DON"T want to see. The data is arbitrarily plucked from thin air. The information is ambiguous and vague. I hate to be so harsh, but this site confounds instead of providing clarity, and the infographics are straight out of PowerPoint.
Randy Willoughby
02.04.13 at 01:47



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



Rob Walker is a technology/culture columnist for Yahoo News. He is the former Consumed columnist for The New York Times Magazine, and has contributed to many publications. He is co-editor (with Joshua Glenn) of the book Significant Objects: 100 Extraordinary Stories About Ordinary Things, and author of Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS