Left: Robert Brownjohn. Right: Liberace.
There's an essay on Liberace
by art critic Dave Hickey
that's so full of vivid insight that it persuaded me, on a recent trip to the US, to visit the Liberace Museum
in Las Vegas. Amongst other things, Hickey describes a visit to drab post-war Britain in 1956 where Liberace's arrival caused a furore. He was the Marilyn Manson of his more-benign era, and consequently, was subjected to indignant abuse by the reactionary popular press. The Daily Mirror
wrote: "Without doubt he is the biggest sentimental vomit of all time. Slobbering over his mother, winking at his brother, and counting the cash at every second, this superb piece of calculating candy floss has an answer for every situation . . . [a] slag heap of lilac-coloured hokum." (Liberace sued.) (And won.)
The influence of American pop (and especially black) music on British pop music, and the way it was subsequently re-imported to the US, has been well documented. But the current exhibition at London's Design Museum
devoted to Robert Brownjohn
and the publication of Sex and Typography,
Emily King's examination of Brownjohn's life and work, sheds new light upon British graphic design's epiphanic encounter with American graphic design in the early 1960s.
A student of Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, the prolific Brownjohn created many of the seminal graphic images with which we recall the sixties: the Rolling Stones' Let it Bleed
album cover, titles for Goldfinger
and From Russia With Love,
for starters. And in describing this period in cultural history, Hickey uses Liberace's castigation by the British press for some typically sharp-brained conjecture. "What intrigues me about (the) invective is the possibility that it might just mark the official beginning of the 'Sixties', as we call them," he writes. "Because Liberace had this great idea. He had touched a jangling nerve, and I like to imagine young John and Paul up in Liverpool, young Mick and Keith down in London, little David Bowie, and the soon-to-be Elton John, in their cloth caps, all full of ambition and working class anger, looking up from their Daily Mirrors with blinking lightbulbs in talk balloons above their heads."
Liberace's taboo-busting outrageousness may well have marked the beginning of the 'Sixties' (the historian Arthur Marwick, in his book The Sixties,
defines the era as running from 1958 to 1974). But for us Brits, Hickey is describing something else as well: the beginnings of a mass adoption of American popular culture by a British populace emerging from its feudal past into the electronic media age.
Brits who came of age in the second half of the twentieth century century grew up in thrall to American pop culture. It was unavoidable, and for most of us (there were some dissenters) it was a thrilling encounter, filled with utopian promise and offering a striking alternative to the staid life of the average Briton. And even if you despised the hegemony of American political culture (which many left-inclined people did) you could still embrace American music, movies and art without demur: Mick Jagger famously turned up at the Grosvenor Square anti-Vietnam demonstration
at the same time that he was making records sounding as if he'd been born in Memphis.Brownjohn,
who received the AIGA medal, posthumously, in 2002, wasn't the only American designer to arrive in Britain at this time. There were others most notably Bob Gill
and Lou Klein
who shook up the moribund British advertising and design scene with a splash of US graphic swagger. English designer Alan Fletcher
was typical of a British sensibility that looked to America for inspiration. In Sex and Typography,
Fletcher eulogises the American mini-invasion: "What impressed me was there was a group of them, about eight or ten of them, all the same age, trying to do the same thing. There were designers like that in London, but there were fewer of them and they were less how can I put this? well, I found them less interesting."
British graphic design, during the early and middle-part of the 20th century, was, in general, neither capable of matching the fizz of American design nor of mirroring the studied introspection of European design. Having famously resisted European Modernism between the wars, the Brits preferred instead to cling to their Victorian past a past where Britannia had ruled a vast global empire and where it was imagined that if you were British you'd won first prize in the lottery of life. Why give all that up for rectilinear architecture and asymmetrical typography?
But many British graphic designers liked the refracted modernism of the American designers. They liked the mercantile strut of American graphics. They liked the fact that graphic design lay at the heart of mass advertising and at the core of big business. Most of all, they liked the fact that American graphic design was about 'ideas'.
British graphic design throughout the 60s and 70s was fixated with the notion that all graphic design statements had to be underpinned by an 'idea'. This normally meant puns and allusive jokes. Design annuals from that period are full of visual gags. Training in a studio in the mid-1970s, I was always asked to describe my 'idea' but I didn't always have an 'idea'. Rather, I liked design that gave aesthetic pleasure and therefore chose colours and typefaces that I liked or that suited the task rather than underpinning everything with an idea.
(This was usually met with scowls and disapproving chin-stroking.) Looking back, I cannot help but blame Robert Brownjohn for this. Like Liberace, he's got a lot to answer for.