Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (7) Posted 02.13.12 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Alexandra Lange

Round Thermostats and Crystal Lanterns, Revisited



Honeywell Round thermostat, 1953; Nest thermostat, 2011 (via TechCrunch)

Updates this week on two design stories I wrote about last year. I hope a little outrage is healthy.

First, it is not only me that noticed the operational similarities between the Henry Dreyfuss-designed Honeywell Round and the new Nest thermostat. This week, Honeywell sued Nest for patent infringement. Most of the cited patents had to do with new technologies involving the way the thermostat learns your heating and cooling habits, and a "natural language installer" that asks the owner questions rather than having you punch complicated combinations of buttons, but two of them, 7159789 and 7159790, date from the 1930s to the 1950s, when Honeywell's engineers were working with Dreyfuss to make the thermostat more intuitive.

As I wrote in December,
Dreyfuss simplified the selection process, reducing heat control to its essence: one curved thermometer; two arrows, one for desired temperature, one for actual temperature; and one gesture, a hand to the Round's cupped surface, clockwise for hotter, counter-clockwise for cooler. In our Apple-y age, Dreyfuss's efforts seem a precursor for interaction design, which seeks to reduce an action to the simplest graphics and the fewest screen-based moves.
Coverage of the lawsuit on tech blogs has predictably focused on the interaction design patents (predictably because these are the same blogs that failed to mention Dreyfuss the first time around). And the general attitude toward Honeywell seems to be: OK, so you had the technology. But what you did with it was crap. The headline on TechCrunch's useful summary: "Honeywell vs Nest: When The Establishment Sues Silicon Valley." On Slate, Farhad Manjoo has a more thorough explication of the anti-Honeywell sentiment.
Honeywell seems to have patented a bunch of great ideas in order to just sit on them. The sad thing is that if it tried, Honeywell seems capable of building a thermostat that’s every bit as wonderful as the Nest. From my testing, I found that Honeywell really does make great home heating and cooling equipment. If it competed in the marketplace rather than in the courts, I suspect it could really turn up the heat on Nest. (Sorry, couldn’t resist.)

Henry Dreyfuss, Honeywell Thermostat Patent D-136,850

But the Round technology, the simplicity of turning a dial to change the temperature, is in many ways the most appealing aspect of the Nest, and the circular shape the element that sets it apart. Honeywell was stupid not to bring it back, but I'm not so sure anyone else has a right to use it. It may be the old patents, rather than the new ones, that help Honeywell make its case.

I must admit, while the tech blogs have a knee-jerk affinity for Apple (and former Apple engineers), I have a knee-jerk affinity for the industrial design greats of old. I couldn't believe that Walter Isaacson, in his biography of Steve Jobs, wrote as if Apple were the first computer company to have a design program. There's no reason to be so snotty about old tricks, and ignorance of the work of Dreyfuss and Eliot Noyes is no excuse.


Manufacturers Hanover Trust (SOM, 1954); Ezra Stoller/ESTO (via Architect's Newspaper)

The second update concerns the fate of Manufacturers Hanover Trust on Fifth Avenue, the bank designed by Gordon Bunshaft, with a vault by Dreyfuss and screen by Harry Bertoia, and the subject of a preservation lawsuit. I wrote about the fear many of us felt when that screen disappeared, under mysterious circumstances, in the fall of 2010. Ada Louise Huxtable, who reviewed the building soon after its opening, wrote in the Wall Street Journal,
It's time to stop worrying about whether New York has enough "starchitecture" and consider the ways in which we are destroying or sabotaging the architecture we already have through neglect, ignorance, disfigurement, willful disregard and the sacrosanct belief that nothing takes precedence over the investment opportunities encouraged by Manhattan's stratospheric real estate values.
Well, the screen is going back, as reported on the New York Times ArtsBeat blog, under the headline, "Preservationists Win a Battle Over Former Manufacturers Hanover Trust Building."
A sculptural screen of 800 floating metal panels by the artist Harry Bertoia will be returned to its home at 510 Fifth Avenue as part of a legal settlement that was made public on Wednesday. The settlement is a result of a lawsuit filed by preservationists in July accusing the building’s owner, Vornado Realty Trust — abetted by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission – of disregarding restrictions intended to protect the interior. The settlement also provides that the landmarks commission expand its designation of the interior to include a black granite wall that is part of the former vault space.
So Dreyfuss and Bertoia will be preserved, but what of the interior around them? After the interior was landmarked, Vornado went ahead and gutted it, tearing out the side-slung escalators as well as the floor, luminous ceiling, and marble cladding on the columns. When I saw the structure standing bare I thought, Oh no, they are never going to put that back. So the fact that they have to add a little glass and put the sculpture back somewhere (like the private third floor, perhaps?) doesn't even count as a slap on the wrist. The first floor will still be divided in two, and a entrances added on Fifth Avenue. The escalators will run east-west. It will be like every other cheap chic clothing emporium on the block, frontal, stuffed.

By being brazen, Vornado has destroyed the inside and the outside of a landmark building, one of the best in New York of the 1950s. I think that hardly counts as a win. It makes me angry that there are no teeth to our preservation laws and no critics powerful enough to shame.

Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


Venture Design


Design Indaba 2012


Faraday Utility Bike


Beyond Gorgeous


A Philatelist’s Dream



RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (7)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

What was the first *computer* company to have a design program?


chicago
02.14.12 at 11:17

International Business Machines (IBM) and Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) were both making mainframes decades before Apple existed, with carefully thought out approaches to systems, human factors engineering and corporate image - an aesthetic perhaps best captured by Kubric's HAL 9000.

Those design efforts had to deal with the organization of relatively large physical components (vacuum tubes, transistors), an effort that persisted but was made invisible via semi-conductor technology.

But a look at the old equipment reveals surprising colors, button & lighting organization, etc. - difficult to compare to a modern handheld device but just as revealing of a designers mind at work, trying to bring clarity to what were, lets remember, digital tools that had room-sized (and sometimes entire building-sized) implications without any of the user interfaces that we now take for granted.

Oh, and, we would be remiss not to mention: Happy Valentines Day Ms. Lange!
Mr. Downer
02.14.12 at 11:51


For those of you who want to know more, in Henry Dreyfuss, Industrial Designer, The Man in the Brown Suit you will find the story of the genesis of the T-86 (Round) thermostat on pp. 143 to 145. It took 13 years and the purchase of two companies following WWII to come up with the technology of the first domestic thermostat with sealed (dust-free) electrical contacts. It was more sophisticated and retailed for less than its competitors from the day it hit the market. It is a measure of Dreyfuss's sway that he could keep the concept alive and in development over such a long period of time, and that he had the ear of the President of the Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. I think those days are long gone. But you might also say that with a designer's "outside point of view" prodding the manufacturer more consistently as Dreyfuss did, Honeywell might have come up with more competitive products recently.

Happy Valentine's Day to Alexandra indeed!
And H

Russell Flinchum
02.14.12 at 10:48

appy Valentine's Day to all you lovers of industrial design, I hope that your troubles are few!
Russell Flinchum
02.14.12 at 10:50

Thank you for the update.

in the current times it is easy to forget the value of the industrial and graphic design and it enduring legacy as i type on a keyboard with a designed arrangement. many of the early solutions still prevail. understanding the history and its value is a continual battle.

i wonder had carved lion's heads and semi naked bass relief figures been included in the works at the bank, if they would have been so indulgently disposed of.

so did Ezra have the Avenue flooded or was the photograph taken during a lull in a rain storm?
Jonathan
02.15.12 at 12:43

What, they are getting rid of the MHT's luminous ceiling? I hope not. That is an integral part of the design (as you can see in that beautiful image). That would be, dare I say, a greater loss than the Bertoia.

That Nest design is a great evolution of the Honeywell classic. In a not-related note, my old Dreyfuss Crane sink got its handles busted and I couldn't find any replacement parts--I wish there was a black market for design related fix-it tips. S*** is old.
Mike Lowe
02.15.12 at 02:12

Very interesting article. As with many everyday objects we often do not notice their design, or just get used to it eventually. I truly believe that most of these designs represent a certain culture or way of thinking, functionality being left far behind.
Mindru Dan
02.24.12 at 01:50



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



Alexandra Lange is an architecture and design critic, and author of Writing about Architecture: Mastering the Language of Buildings and Cities. (Princeton Architectural Press, 2012). Her work has appeared in The Architect's Newspaper, Architectural Record, Dwell, Metropolis, Print, New York Magazine and The New York Times.
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









BOOKS BY Alexandra Lange

Writing About Architecture: Mastering the Language of Buildings and Cities
Princeton Architectural Press, 2012

Design Research
Chronicle Books, 2010

More books by contributors >>