Design Observer

Archive
Books + Store
Job Board
Email Archive
Comments
About
Contact
Log In
Register



Observatory

Resources
Submissions
About
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (9) Posted 01.06.08 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Thomas Frank

Taking Things Seriously V


thomas_frank.jpg

I collect First World War artifacts, but not because I am one of these guys who spends his weekends reenacting battles. I have trouble even understanding why someone would want to act out the trench warfare of 1917. This was wholesale slaughter, industrialized and indifferent to individual heroics. Take a number and die. One might as well reenact the Spanish Flu.

I regard this French artillery helmet as a token of monumental disillusionment, a reminder of the greatest-ever failure of enlightened, middle-class, Christian civilization. This was the event where the official narrative — delivered by statesmen, preachers, and leaders of industry — ran so contrary to reality that faith in those institutions was weakened forever.

As it happens, my hometown of Kansas City is the location of a twenty-one-story-high World War I monument and a very large collection of Great War artifacts. As a schoolboy I approached these pieces with the form of patriotic reverence that the museum and the monument embodied. American wars were about freedom, I believed. And honor. And protecting hometowns. It was difficult for the idealistic young me to grasp that what happened on the Western Front was that millions of brave men were ordered to die in an ill-planned and essentially futile conflict.

Today we are in the grip of a different sort of pro-war sentiment, a militarism in which the cynicism is readymade and the disillusionment is build-in, in which our GIs are always said to be betrayed by journalists and (liberal) politicians back home. Whenever some of that angry logic floats my way, I find it helpful to gaze upon that steel helmet and remember the lessons its wearer learned.

This short essay is excerpted from Taking Things Seriously: 75 Objects with Unexpected Significance, a book by Joshua Glenn and Carol Hayes in which they and other writers discuss the importance of objects in their lives. This is the fifth essay in a series to appear on Design Observer.



|
Share This Story

RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (9)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Indeed. I wish some of our politicians would take a good look at that helmet . . . and take from it the same lessons you did.
Wailea Kango
01.07.08 at 02:26

The National World War One Museum (formerly known as Liberty Memorial) in Kansas City, Mo., as mentioned by Mr. Frank above, is amazing. It was recently expanded by Ralph Appelbaum Assoc., led by Josh Dudley, in 2006. The original memorial was designed by architect H. Van Buren Magonigle, and completed in 1928. You can still go up in the tower, too. If you get a chance, visit!

Very Respectfully,
Joe Moran
01.07.08 at 11:26

Have you read Paul Fussell's Great War and Modern Memory? It is a fascinating, illuminating look at that "official narrative" and its long-reaching effects.
M.A. Peel
01.09.08 at 02:05

Got mit uns (God for us)

After reading Jessica's post Remembering Paul Rand, I started looking at some of the work of George Grosz. (George Grosz was Paul Rand's teacher at the Art Students League of New York.)

I think George Grosz would agree with your thoughts on Taking Things Seriously in an anti-serious way. Above is a link to his portfolio cover for Got mit uns (God for us) now at MOMA. (1919, published 1920 Letterpress and lineblock). This political portfolio brought Grosz up on charges of defaming the Reichswehr.

"It is a mistake to believe if you paint circles, cubes or some profound jumble of lines that you are being revolutionary . . . Your brushes and pens, which should be your weapons, are empty straws. Go out of your rooms, . . . allow yourselves to be captured by ideas of working people, help them in the struggle against a rotten society." — George Grosz 1920/21
Carl W. Smith
01.10.08 at 10:45

It seems that warfare is a natural and will persist in one form or another for a very long time. It is horrible to think that we have not learned from the steel helmet and all the others that have come after it.

I think that Earnest Hemingway summed the problem of warfare up well.

Never think that war, no matter how necessary, nor how justified, is not a crime. ~Ernest Hemingway

JasonP
01.10.08 at 02:43

Agreed, JasonP.

Hemingway also said, "Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never really care for anything else thereafter."

A war as a large cultural event produces its own smaller, more personal wars. And I say this not with condemnation but with understanding gleaned from my own personal experience. War is a virus.

I would recommend On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society by Dave Grossman. Its an excellent read about how we overcome the natural human resistance to killing another human.

Imagine what positive things you could do with all that energy and organzation.
Tim
01.11.08 at 10:21

I'll be sure to take On Killing to the next NARAL rally I come across. I'm sure it will be well received.
john
01.11.08 at 11:37

Are you guys writing about the thing, or the things in the hunting, breeding, fore-, back-, under-, high-, or playground?


Nancy
01.13.08 at 11:47

Gott mit uns

ga-ga-ga-ga- G loves

Sorry, it just came out.

learning to read
01.13.08 at 11:56



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Thomas Frank is the author of What’s the Matter with Kansas? and One Market Under God. The founding editor of The Baffler and a contributing editor at Harper’s, he is also The Wall Street Journal’s newest weekly columnist. He has received a Lannan award and been a guest columnist for The New York Times.
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS









RELATED POSTS


Mr. Vignelli's Map
Vignelli Celebration: Massimo Vignelli's 1972 New York City subway map is a beautiful example of information design that was ultimately rejected by its users.

Reflections on The Ephemeral World, Part One: Ink
An elegy to the makeready — those sheets of paper, re-fed into a press to get the ink balances up to speed, leaving a series of often random, palimpsest-like, multiple impressions on a single surface — in the digital age.

Cranbrook Commencement Address
"I come to you, like all commencement speakers, as an emissary from the future." The commencement address delivered by Julie Lasky at the Cranbrook Academy of Art on May 9, 2008.

Greening the Grocery Store
It turns out that the "recycling symbol" at the bottom of my yogurt container had nothing to do with its recyclability. So why was it there? My curiosity led to findings around which I built a design class.

O.H.W. Hadank
Paul Rand held Hadank in the highest esteem because he practiced modernist formal principles even though he did not follow its dogma or style. And most important, as Rand said “Hadank was then and always an original. A profile of O.H.W. Hadank by Steven Heller...