Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (3) Posted 05.17.12 | PERMALINK | PRINT

John Thackara

Who Is the Arne Jacobsen of Urban Food?


food issue map

At a workshop on food in cities at Aarhus School of Architecture in Denmark last week I learned: that the largest food exporter in Sweden is Ikea (meatballs); that for every meal eaten in a UK restaurant, nearly half a kilo of food is wasted; that about 40 percent of the food produced in the United States isn’t consumed; that every day, Americans waste enough food to fill the Rose Bowl; that US citizens waste 50 per cent more food today than they did in 1974; and that that doggy bags are taboo in Danish restaurants.

These were spicy facts to be confronted with — but what is one to do with this sort of information? Food waste is just one among a bunch of ‘wicked’ questions concerning food in cities. There are no simple answers. Half the time, there is no consensus on what the problem is.

The image above, for example (given to me by one of the Aarhus students, Christina Amelie Jensen), plots the different actors that inhabit the food waste ‘issue space’ — just in restaurants. A constellation of mixed agendas and often conflicting motives is plotted on this map of the people who need to cooperate: farmers, food distributors, chefs, customers. Even language is a challenge; the Aarhus students found that the word “waste” was an obstacle to communication when they went to talk to people; it made many of them defensive and closed.

My host in Aarhus, Peter Krogh, joked that we were looking for an Arne Jacobsen of urban food systems. But although armchair urban farmers are not hard to find, equipment is low down the list of design priorities on the ground. The activation of ecosystems in cities, it turns out, is more cultural and organisational, than artifactual. To make matters harder: there’s a lot of knowledge out there, but territorial planning for resilient food systems, urban agriculture, and ecosystem management, are complex and multi-dimensional activities.

We nonetheless concluded, in Aarhus, that there are plenty opportunities for designers to do useful work here. A successful issues map, for example, like the one shown above, can be as valuable a design outcome as the blueprint for a structure, or system. At a city-region scale, in particular, new and better tools are needed to monitor, map and evaluate food flows. These are tasks that service and interaction designers can help with.

Many people are developing ways for schools to get involved in food growing, too — and one of the the Aarhus groups — having discovered that most Danish schools lack both the space and the time to grow food on a large scale — was keen to introduce a lightweight and easily deployed kit of parts that could be sneaked in to liminal schoolyard spaces (below).

school garden

Thus encouraged, we went on to list other unique qualities architects and interaction designers might bring to the development of a city’s food sub-systems:
  • architecture has a track record in dealing with complex systems — political, financial, and production ones; few other professions have this capability;
  • architecture deals with the unique specificities of space and place — not just with strategy, as a business consultant does;
  • architecture engages with the world at multiple temporal scales — from the short-term, to the very long term; this is important when it comes to growing food and managing waste flows;
  • architecture deals with wholes — unlike science, which breaks things down into parts.

At a time when big-name architects are under fire for “bleeding cities dry” with the fees they earn from the design of iconic buildings, it was encouraging to witness the next generation of designers engaging with tough questions urban food. But our encounter quickly confronted a painful reality: hard questions of poverty, and land-grabs by the rich in distant countries, have as much impact on the food we eat as the portions we waste in restaurants.

A a US charity called Halfsies, for example, has set out to educate Americans about food waste, and help poor people in Africa, at the same time. Their features a heart-warming photograph of four abandoned babies being fed at a home in Gulu, Northern Uganda. Trouble is, the Halfsies booklet does not mention the probable reason those orphans are homeless in the first place. As this film about land grabs for oil in Uganda explains, it is because investors from our own rich countries are grabbing land, and displacing the poor families that used to live on it, that children like these used have ended up in this predicament.

Urban farming is a cool design topic these days — but if we’re to make a serious impact on the global food system, we need to show meaningful solidarity with its victims in distant places, too.
Share This Story


RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (3)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Regarding your point on equipment "But although armchair urban farmers are not hard to find, equipment is low down the list of design priorities on the ground.". Meaning perhaps less images of new urban farming interventions and more making...

Bit with a technology mix of what the folks over at Factor e Farm are doing with Open Source Ecology but applied more at the city/home (not farm)-scaled, DIY like the old book The Integral Urban House by the Farallones Institute but for the 21st century?
namhenderson
05.26.12 at 05:14

Urban Ag is cool, but the more fundamental question addressed at the end is far more interesting.

A small number of committed people can indeed change the world, but not by finding a formula for sustainability and independence for a few semi-rich people/cities with certain inclinations.

Who will be the Arne Jacobsen of governance?

Showing solidarity is important if you have no power. But as semi-rich citizens of the developed world we have far more power than is required to give our compatriots consequences for their bad behavior.

Who will be the Arne Jacobsen of mobilization?

800,000 people turning out simultaneously in a handful of major US cities could put any US law into effect, any global behavior in check. The same would keep it in check. This formula applies across most of the rich world.

Perhaps 1% of the nation, 1.01% of the 99%?

Until we stop shirking that responsibility, until we start respecting our own democracy (in the supra-electoral sense), we will waste away on these blogs like hungry ghosts dreaming of the quality of play we could employ to fulfill our basic needs, if only *they* didn't have so much power.

The Arne Jacobsen of Urban Food is alive today, probably in the dozens. They make no revolution because they can't, because we allow it remain impossible.

Though we will employ it in our struggle, design is not our weapon but our reward.
jdavidmoffet
06.02.12 at 12:13

Forgot to say thanks, John. I come to design observer for observations like this:

"A a US charity called Halfsies, for example, has set out to educate Americans about food waste, and help poor people in Africa, at the same time. Their features a heart-warming photograph of four abandoned babies being fed at a home in Gulu, Northern Uganda. Trouble is, the Halfsies booklet does not mention the probable reason those orphans are homeless in the first place."

This really can't be said enough in the design community. Designers and systems thinkers have a tremendous amount of power to trimtab the course of the world, and yet most of us can't even extrapolate the lessons of weeding a simple garden. We furiously pluck leaves from the weeds, little realizing that we have the ability to pull them up by the roots.
jdavidmoffet
06.02.12 at 12:34



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



John Thackara is a writer, speaker and design producer, and director of Doors of Perception. In addition to this blog, he is the author of twelve books including In The Bubble: Designing In A Complex World and Wouldn't It Be Great If….
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS