Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (1) Posted 10.16.12 | PERMALINK | PRINT

John Thackara

Transition Dogville


In Lars von Trier’s 2003 film Dogville (below) there is almost no set. Buildings in the town are represented by a series of white outlines on the floor. Dogville was a to-the-limit exercise in what von Trier calls ‘pure cinema’ — a commitment to use only real locations, and no special effects or background music, when making a film.

Dogeville

I was reminded of Dogville during a this year’s Transition Conference in London. There were talks and workshops, of course, but our main task was to create the working physical model of a town centre, a few years ahead, in which the services needed for a resilient community would be in place — and open for business. We had four hours to do it.

As a first step, a dry-run took place on a huge sheet pre-drawn to show streets and buildings….

Then, for the main event, white lines were taped onto the floor of the main hall; these delineated the main spaces available to be occupied by new enterprises…



Meanwhile, small groups sketched ideas for the different services they would like to see in their town…



Their proposals ranged from the practical, to the poetic…



The various social enterprise ideas were clustered on bigger blackboards around the edge of the room…



Around each cluster, people self-organised themselves into start-up teams; each person below is carrying a sign that states what skill they can bring to the proposed enterprise…



Each team then built its shop (we had 30 minutes for this design-and-build phase)…



…and then opened for business. Shown below is a walk-in community facilitation and mediation service — complete with cups of tea ready for stressed-out clients…



Resilientville’s citizens then toured the town visiting the new establishments…



The day (and the conference as a whole) ended with a Town Hall meeting.



In an earlier post I asked — in the context of facilitating mixed groups with different cultures and agendas — how do you manage a constellation? I concluded then that our collective design task is to bring together visions, ways of knowing, and ways of collaborating. With Transitionville, we achieved most of that in half a day.

One could argue, of course, that designing a resilient English country town, as we did in Battersea Town Hall last week, has little in common with the challenges people face in Detroit, Sao Paulo — or for that matter inner London. One could also quibble that our focus on a town centre reinforces a type of economic geography that would be unsustainable in a rural or suburban context.

These points are valid, but beside the point. Nobody is promoting this exercise as a universal game to be copied, in this form, in other contexts. Its lesson, as Chrissie Godfrey put it at an earlier Transition conference, is that paying attention to the process by which groups work together is just as important as growing food or putting up windmills. “No group is perfect, there are always the tensions and power dynamics at play” says Godfrey; “but being able to embrace and work with difference is a real positive — and that takes a particular skill set and a willingness to participate in the life of the group”.
Share This Story


RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (1)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

I must say that I really enjoyed reading this post and found it to be quite uplifting. The degradation of society at its most relevant and personal levels, being our communities, creates proliferation of ignorance, lack of inventiveness and absence of creativity. It is encouraging to see what people desire for themselves and the environments in which they live. Although it was stated that this exercise was not meant to catch on as a trend by any means, I think it would be a great learning experience and serve as a great platform of reformation for many societies. Our world is in great need of this type of "grassroots" ideology which resonates within each of us in one way or another.
Hannah Yarbrough
10.23.12 at 10:39



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



John Thackara is a writer, speaker and design producer, and director of Doors of Perception. In addition to this blog, he is the author of twelve books including In The Bubble: Designing In A Complex World and Wouldn't It Be Great If….
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS