Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (6) Posted 11.14.12 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Mark Lamster

F*ck Elegant




Friends: A scourge has beset our culture, and something must be done. It may seem innocuous at first, but in truth it is an insidious force, eating away at the very foundation of all we hold dear. Even I have fallen victim to its powers of seduction. Ladies and gentleman, I refer to the ceaselessly expanding use of the term elegant. We must stop. 

The purpose of language is to convey meaning, but at this point elegant has become the most empty of signifiers. The problem may be attributed to overuse. Google elegant and you come up with 457 million results. The universe is elegant, but so is a toilet, a canoe, a dog collar, and every plastic surgery victim on reality tv. And then there's elegant's idiot bastard child, casual elegance, the very definition of an oxymoron, but one with increasing relevance as our culture becomes ever more lax, but ever more obsessed with consumption and wealth. It is not surprising that elegant has become a defining word of our era of 1 percenters.

We use elegant because it suggests, with comfortable vagueness, a variety of cultural values that we broadly admire and aspire to: prestige, luxury, comfort, affluence, intelligence, grace, beauty. These are all abstractions, and therefore pose serious challenges to writers, especially those in cultural disciplines. It's hard to explain why a new chair or building or idea is especially noteworthy or important or valuable, and so perhaps unconsciously we resort to the lazy catchall, expecting it will do the work for us. That's not good enough. 

Unless you're reporting on an evening with Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers at the Rainbow Room, a highly unlikely scenario, you really have little continued justification for the use of the term elegant. So please stop doing so. We can all do better. Thanks. 
Share This Story


RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (6)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Do you realize that you are not referring to the correct definition of elegance? Usually when referring to design, this definition is used:

(From Mathematics) Combining simplicity, power, and a certain ineffable grace of design. Higher praise than "clever", "winning" or even cuspy.

(Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/elegant?r=75&src=ref&ch=dic )
thejaw
11.14.12 at 09:24

loss of meaning=brutalist, starch i tect, elegant?

Rainbow Room, now that was elegant, Fred and Ginger, real or imagined
Jonathan
11.14.12 at 10:32

I agree that certain words are lazily being overused. If I hear 'amazing' for something that is puerile one more time I'll blow a fuse! Our language has got bombastic in the wrong context.
lee
11.17.12 at 07:04

This is great, Mark. I suddenly realize that my personal least-favorite use of the word is in the phrase "elegant solution," most often to describe some element of interaction design. Anyway I think you're right on point here, so thanks.
Rob Walker
11.17.12 at 06:56

@thejaw *like
Sally
11.25.12 at 01:10

touche en garde' elegant.
RD
11.15.13 at 12:15



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



Mark Lamster is the architecture critic of the Dallas Morning News and a professor at the University of Texas at Arlington School of Architecture. A contributing editor to Architectural Review, he is currently at work on his third book, a biography of the late architect Philip Johnson. Follow: @marklamster.
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS