Design Observer

About
Books
Job Board
Newsletters
Archive
Contact



Observatory

About
Resources
Submissions
Contact


Featured Writers

Michael Bierut
William Drenttel
John Foster
Jessica Helfand
Alexandra Lange
Mark Lamster
Paul Polak
Rick Poynor
John Thackara
Rob Walker


Departments

Advertisement
Audio
Books
Collections
Dear Bonnie
Dialogues
Essays
Events
Foster Column
From Our Archive
Gallery
Interviews
Miscellaneous
New Ideas
Opinions
Partner News
Photos
Poetry
Primary Sources
Projects
Report
Reviews
Slideshows
The Academy
Today Column
Unusual Suspects
Video


Topics

Advertising
Architecture
Art
Books
Branding
Business
Cities / Places
Community
Craft
Culture
Design History
Design Practice
Development
Disaster Relief
Ecology
Economy
Education
Energy
Environment
Fashion
Film / Video
Food/Agriculture
Geography
Global / Local
Graphic Design
Health / Safety
History
Housing
Ideas
Illustration
India
Industry
Info Design
Infrastructure
Interaction Design
Internet / Blogs
Journalism
Landscape
Literature
Magazines
Media
Museums
Music
Nature
Obituary
Other
Peace
Philanthropy
Photography
Planning
Poetry
Politics / Policy
Popular Culture
Poverty
Preservation
Product Design
Public / Private
Public Art
Religion
Reputations
Science
Shelter
Social Enterprise
Sports
Sustainability
Technology
Theory/Criticism
Transportation
TV / Radio
Typography
Urbanism
Water


Comments (2) Posted 09.09.13 | PERMALINK | PRINT

Mark Lamster

High Net Space: The New International Style




In a now classic post on bldgblog, Geoff Manaugh coined the term "Nakatomi Space," a reference to the action film Die Hard, in which supercop John McLain navigates a fictional L.A. skyscraper (the Nakatomi Building) through its infrastructure, suggesting an alternate and largely invisible urban environment that we rarely think about. (This is a corollary to what I have described as the Foundry Principle, the action-picture imperative, reaching back to the 1960s but de rigeur since The Terminator, to set final altercations in industrial spaces.) But I digress.

With a nod to Manaugh, in a review this weekend of Dallas's notoriously reflective Museum Tower I suggest my own term, High Net Space, or HNS, to describe the new International Style of the moneyed elite: 
The lobby is cool and limpid and pristine, a professional execution of an aesthetic — call it High Net Space — characterized by expensive materials and blandly minimalist good taste. Here, HNS is translated here into a quarry’s worth of white marble, its veins oriented toward elevators that travel at 1,200 feet per minute — reportedly the fastest in the city — and open directly into the residences, a handy convenience.
I don't know if it will catch on, but it is an improvement on the flawed nomenclature we now resort to. Citing the same trend in his recent Cronocaos exhibition, Rem Koolhaas — who knows a thing or two about the subject — gave us this aphorism: "Minimalism remains the preferred mode of conspicuous consumption."

We all know what he means, basically, but at this point the term "minimalism" has been used so broadly as to become almost meaningless. There was a time when the architectural aesthetic was tied, at least tangentially, to the conceptual art movement. Now "minimalism" can be used to describe a 10,000 square-foot beach house. There's nothing minimal about that.

@marklamster
Share This Story

RELATED POSTS


Girard the Magnificent


Landscape Forensics


Giraffe Houses of the Ozarks


Olympic Urbanism: The Athletes' Village


The Collaborative Legacy of Merce Cunningham



RSS Subscribe to Comment Feed

Comments (2)   |   JUMP TO MOST RECENT >>

Die Hard 3 is to urban design as Die Hard 1 is to 'minimalist' skyscrapers.
And then there's Die Hard 12: Die Hungry. "Paper or plastic you son of a ___!"

It is funny that the Museum Tower in Dallas would see I.M. Pei as an inspiration; that's very thin ice to be walking on. Obviously Nakatomi (or Fox Tower) is a kind of bland, sensory depriving style. Every movement seems to catalyze inferior copies, that claim the original brand, but live by their own particular realities and choices.

The meanest girls are usually the ones that aren't as pretty as they think they are. At the same time the Museum Tower, as well as every so-called modern architect today, seems to be easy targets for increasingly petty issues like light refraction and the same 'elitist' critique that falls on all new buildings. It's hard to trust anything nowadays when Jimmy Kimmel could be lurking behind the closed door.

What is lacking in much of these buildings is that combination of modern with the romantic. Perhaps BIG's W57 will solve a bit of this dilemma, though many times it seems like just another new brand of modernism, this time moved even further into material realities into marketing gimmicks and computer diagrams. The same elitist socio-political substance wrapped in a new overwrought intellectual fashion? The only guarantee is that there will be hype and a lot of catchphrases. But at least BIG is trying to build his fictions, instead of fetishizing techno-fiction like BLDGBLOG.
Mike Lowe
09.11.13 at 05:19

"Mean Girls" is a great phrase for detached glass towers, as well as for a lot of twitter chatter about design in general.
Brian J. McKnight
09.15.13 at 07:25



LOG IN TO POST A COMMENT
Don't have an account? Create an account. Forgot your password? Click here.

Email


Password




|
Share This Story



Mark Lamster is the architecture critic of the Dallas Morning News and a professor at the University of Texas at Arlington School of Architecture. A contributing editor to Architectural Review, he is currently at work on his third book, a biography of the late architect Philip Johnson. Follow: @marklamster.
More >>

DESIGN OBSERVER JOBS